X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_SV X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <50215120.4030207@acm.org> Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 10:32:16 -0700 From: David Rothenberger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin 1.7.15: svn disk I/O error References: <50206AE0 DOT 90101 AT etr-usa DOT com> <50207BAC DOT 7030306 AT etr-usa DOT com> In-Reply-To: <50207BAC.7030306@etr-usa.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 8/6/2012 7:21 PM, Warren Young wrote: > Some time after *that*, at a future time entirely up to the Subversion > packages' maintainer, David Rothenberger, Subversion will be rebuilt > against those new SQLite packages. Is that actually necessary? SVN is dynamically linked to SQLite, so a recompile isn't necessary unless the ABI for SQLite changes, right? -- David Rothenberger ---- daveroth AT acm DOT org What hath Bob wrought? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple