X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RCVD_VIA_APNIC,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <501CB163.4020904@orcon.net.nz>
Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2012 17:21:39 +1200
From: Glyn <gnwinorcon AT orcon DOT net DOT nz>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20120613 Icedove/3.0.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: libgc bug when using Gnu C nested functions
References: <1343734181 DOT 29442 DOT ezmlm AT cygwin DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <1343734181.29442.ezmlm@cygwin.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-DSPAM-Check: by mx3.orcon.net.nz on Sat, 04 Aug 2012 17:21:36 +1200
X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent
X-DSPAM-Processed: Sat Aug  4 17:21:36 2012
X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.5264
X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000
X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN, default)
X-Spam-Score: 0.00 () [Hold at 5.50]
X-CanIt-Geo: ip=121.98.48.144; country=NZ; region=G1; city=Hamilton; latitude=-37.7833; longitude=175.2833; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=-37.7833,175.2833&z=6
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

 > Years ago I became maintainer of libgc only in order to get w3m
 > working. And unfortunately I have not kept it current with the
 > upstream libgc. Several newer versions back it was causing w3m to
 > throw errors in my dev environment so I didn't proceed at that time.

 > I'll either attempt to upgrade or seek a new maintainer, which might
 > take a bit of time, my apologies!

 > Bob

Great, thanks. I'm glad to know it's not a mystery, because I
imagine it would would have been quite a big one! I've found
a mostly reasonable alternative to using glibc for now, so no
hurry.

--Glyn


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple