X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <501C2E54.6080603@cornell.edu> Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 16:02:28 -0400 From: Ken Brown User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: crash on latest cygwin snapshot References: <20120801122902 DOT GC17949 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <50192522 DOT 4090507 AT cornell DOT edu> <20120801125834 DOT GH17949 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <501A946A DOT 2030102 AT cornell DOT edu> <87zk6dcgfg DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <20120802182129 DOT GA11728 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <87r4rpcdhx DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <20120802193416 DOT GB11728 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <501B3FE6 DOT 90006 AT cornell DOT edu> <20120803034119 DOT GA15831 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20120803162146 DOT GA15383 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> In-Reply-To: <20120803162146.GA15383@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-CORNELL-SPAM-CHECKED: Pawpaw X-Original-Sender: kbrown AT cornell DOT edu - Fri Aug 3 16:02:32 2012 X-PMX-CORNELL-REASON: CU_White_List_Override X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 8/3/2012 12:21 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 11:41:19PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 11:05:10PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote: >>> On 8/2/2012 3:34 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>>> On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 09:14:50PM +0200, Achim Gratz wrote: >>>>> Christopher Faylor writes: >>>>>> Just to be clear: Is this with the recent snapshot? >>>>> >>>>> Yes, this is with the 2012-08-01 snapshot. >>>>> >>>>>> I ask because one other "I see something similar" seemed to come from >>>>>> 1.7.16. >>>>> >>>>> I'm almost always running a snapshot, but I can back it out to vanilla >>>>> Cygwin or any other snapshot if it helps finding the error. I don't >>>>> think I've had any other updates except mesa inbetween switching from >>>>> the snapshot I used before and the current one ??? but that is >>>>> circumstancial evidence only. >>>> >>>> It would be interesting to see if you or Ken have a problem with the >>>> 20120730 snapshot. >>>> >>>> And, if so, then an strace would probably be useful, although it would >>>> be huge. If you do get one, let me know how to download it or I can >>>> provide temporary storage somewhere. >>> >>> I do have the same problem with the 20120730 snapshot. I started emacs >>> in an xterm window, attached strace, and walked away. This time it >>> didn't take long for emacs to crash, so the strace output isn't huge: >>> >>> wget http://sanibeltranquility.com/cygwin/strace.out >> >> Thanks. I think I see the problem but I won't be able to get to it >> tonight. >> >> It's in the new signal handling code. > > I was actually able to duplicate this fairly easy. It took me too long > to realize that I had to run the X version of emacs, when that should > have been obvious from the strace. > > I have uploaded a new snapshot which should fix the problem. > > Can you confirm Ken? I'm testing. It looks good so far, but I'd like to get emacs running without a crash for 24 hours before I'm confident. I'll report back tomorrow. I'm also testing to see if the recent changes have fixed the problem that I was struggling with in http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2012-04/msg00048.html . That also looks good so far. Ken -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple