X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX18WHjamRJjcnGs9P3xiPvM5 Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 23:41:19 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: crash on latest cygwin snapshot Message-ID: <20120803034119.GA15831@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <50190645 DOT 2050209 AT gmail DOT com> <20120801122902 DOT GC17949 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <50192522 DOT 4090507 AT cornell DOT edu> <20120801125834 DOT GH17949 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <501A946A DOT 2030102 AT cornell DOT edu> <87zk6dcgfg DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <20120802182129 DOT GA11728 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <87r4rpcdhx DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <20120802193416 DOT GB11728 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <501B3FE6 DOT 90006 AT cornell DOT edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <501B3FE6.90006@cornell.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 11:05:10PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote: >On 8/2/2012 3:34 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 09:14:50PM +0200, Achim Gratz wrote: >>> Christopher Faylor writes: >>>> Just to be clear: Is this with the recent snapshot? >>> >>> Yes, this is with the 2012-08-01 snapshot. >>> >>>> I ask because one other "I see something similar" seemed to come from >>>> 1.7.16. >>> >>> I'm almost always running a snapshot, but I can back it out to vanilla >>> Cygwin or any other snapshot if it helps finding the error. I don't >>> think I've had any other updates except mesa inbetween switching from >>> the snapshot I used before and the current one ??? but that is >>> circumstancial evidence only. >> >> It would be interesting to see if you or Ken have a problem with the >> 20120730 snapshot. >> >> And, if so, then an strace would probably be useful, although it would >> be huge. If you do get one, let me know how to download it or I can >> provide temporary storage somewhere. > >I do have the same problem with the 20120730 snapshot. I started emacs >in an xterm window, attached strace, and walked away. This time it >didn't take long for emacs to crash, so the strace output isn't huge: > >wget http://sanibeltranquility.com/cygwin/strace.out Thanks. I think I see the problem but I won't be able to get to it tonight. It's in the new signal handling code. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple