X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <501B3FE6.90006@cornell.edu> Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 23:05:10 -0400 From: Ken Brown User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: crash on latest cygwin snapshot References: <4FF1B37A DOT 4000902 AT gmail DOT com> <20120801094311 DOT GE18636 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <50190645 DOT 2050209 AT gmail DOT com> <20120801122902 DOT GC17949 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <50192522 DOT 4090507 AT cornell DOT edu> <20120801125834 DOT GH17949 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <501A946A DOT 2030102 AT cornell DOT edu> <87zk6dcgfg DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <20120802182129 DOT GA11728 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <87r4rpcdhx DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <20120802193416 DOT GB11728 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> In-Reply-To: <20120802193416.GB11728@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-CORNELL-SPAM-CHECKED: Pawpaw X-Original-Sender: kbrown AT cornell DOT edu - Thu Aug 2 23:05:18 2012 X-PMX-CORNELL-REASON: CU_White_List_Override X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 8/2/2012 3:34 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 09:14:50PM +0200, Achim Gratz wrote: >> Christopher Faylor writes: >>> Just to be clear: Is this with the recent snapshot? >> >> Yes, this is with the 2012-08-01 snapshot. >> >>> I ask because one other "I see something similar" seemed to come from >>> 1.7.16. >> >> I'm almost always running a snapshot, but I can back it out to vanilla >> Cygwin or any other snapshot if it helps finding the error. I don't >> think I've had any other updates except mesa inbetween switching from >> the snapshot I used before and the current one ??? but that is >> circumstancial evidence only. > > It would be interesting to see if you or Ken have a problem with the > 20120730 snapshot. > > And, if so, then an strace would probably be useful, although it would > be huge. If you do get one, let me know how to download it or I can > provide temporary storage somewhere. I do have the same problem with the 20120730 snapshot. I started emacs in an xterm window, attached strace, and walked away. This time it didn't take long for emacs to crash, so the strace output isn't huge: wget http://sanibeltranquility.com/cygwin/strace.out Ken -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple