X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_YG X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87a9ydcc0q.fsf@Rainer.invalid> References: <874noldv5a DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <87a9ydcc0q DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 15:20:49 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Perl 5.14.2 seems to expect gcc-4 From: Reini Urban To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Achim Gratz wrote: > Reini Urban writes: >> Please don't spread fud. Self-compiled cpan packages are always >> favored over vendor packages. See your @INC. > > I really meant packages, of the Cygwin variant (I've got cygport > definitions for all of them and posted a link to them over in > cygwin-apps). Managing dependencies with an opaque blob like > perl_vendor seemed more trouble than creating some 240 or so packages > that include all that are in perl_vendor, but one package for each > distribution (and an umbrella package for installing them all in one > go). I would be happy to assign it over to you if you are happy with it. I have no time to maintain hundreds of packages which change monthly. -- Reini Urban http://cpanel.net/ http://www.perl-compiler.org/ -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple