X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1/JKOUYOVl9lUywMhbL3oMQ Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 15:34:16 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: crash on latest cygwin snapshot Message-ID: <20120802193416.GB11728@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4FF1B37A DOT 4000902 AT gmail DOT com> <20120801094311 DOT GE18636 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <50190645 DOT 2050209 AT gmail DOT com> <20120801122902 DOT GC17949 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <50192522 DOT 4090507 AT cornell DOT edu> <20120801125834 DOT GH17949 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <501A946A DOT 2030102 AT cornell DOT edu> <87zk6dcgfg DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <20120802182129 DOT GA11728 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <87r4rpcdhx DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87r4rpcdhx.fsf@Rainer.invalid> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 09:14:50PM +0200, Achim Gratz wrote: >Christopher Faylor writes: >> Just to be clear: Is this with the recent snapshot? > >Yes, this is with the 2012-08-01 snapshot. > >> I ask because one other "I see something similar" seemed to come from >> 1.7.16. > >I'm almost always running a snapshot, but I can back it out to vanilla >Cygwin or any other snapshot if it helps finding the error. I don't >think I've had any other updates except mesa inbetween switching from >the snapshot I used before and the current one ??? but that is >circumstancial evidence only. It would be interesting to see if you or Ken have a problem with the 20120730 snapshot. And, if so, then an strace would probably be useful, although it would be huge. If you do get one, let me know how to download it or I can provide temporary storage somewhere. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple