X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL,TW_XM,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <501A832E.3000703@cs.utoronto.ca> Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 09:39:58 -0400 From: Ryan Johnson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: How to keep a dependency from [continually] appearing in setup References: <50185716 DOT 8050504 AT cornell DOT edu> <50191B67 DOT 5010106 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca> <50192B7B DOT 5060501 AT cornell DOT edu> <50193AA8 DOT 8050307 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca> <50197B86 DOT 9060308 AT cornell DOT edu> <501A7E31 DOT 100 AT cornell DOT edu> In-Reply-To: <501A7E31.100@cornell.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 02/08/2012 9:18 AM, Ken Brown wrote: > On 8/2/2012 5:14 AM, Adam Dinwoodie wrote: >> Ken Brown wrote: >>> On 8/1/2012 10:18 AM, Ryan Johnson wrote: >>>> It can be argued that emacs-auctex should not pull in texlive. Most >>>> users installing emacs-auctex will already have some flavor of tex in >>>> place, and not necessarily the cygwin one (like the OP, or perhaps a >>>> MikTex user). Plus, the error message is pretty intuitive and the >>>> solution very simple, if latex is not there: "latex: no such command" >>>> ==> "maybe I should install latex." Therefore, the expected aggregate >>> >>> There's more to it than that. emacs-auctex installs stuff needed for >>> its preview feature in /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/preview/. This won't >>> be found by native texlive or by MikTeX. >>> >>>> frustration of users who installed auctex without latex available >>>> would >>>> likely be far lower than the aggregate frustration of users wanting to >>>> install auctex and getting saddled with an unwanted redundant texlive >>>> distribution (for which there is no easy solution). >>> >>> Why is this so frustrating? It doesn't do any harm (except waste a >>> small amount of disk space) to install Cygwin's texlive in parallel >>> with >>> native texlive. Just make sure the bin directory of the latter >>> precedes >>> /usr/bin in PATH. I myself have both installed, since I sometimes find >>> it useful for testing purposes to be able to switch from one to the >>> other (by temporarily changing PATH). >> >> I'd draw a parallel between the emacs-auctex's dependency on latex >> and libX11's >> dependency on xorg-server: while xorg-server is certainly the >> preferred X >> server for Cygwin, it's not the only option[0]. >> >> [0]: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2012-02/msg00602.html > > The situations aren't parallel. Cygwin's libX11 will work with X > servers other than xorg-server. But Cygwin's emacs-auctex, as I > explained above, will not work OOTB with tex installations other than > Cygwin's texlive. The preview feature will be broken. > > Users who prefer a different tex installation and want to use auctex > should build and install auctex themselves. During installation, > auctex will find the appropriate texmf tree and put its preview files > there. Fair enough. I was just throwing the idea out there in case it made sense to the people who know what's going on. Sound like it doesn't make sense to remove that dependency. Ryan -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple