X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Berber?= Subject: Re: cygwin port forwarding Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 12:43:17 -0500 Lines: 21 Message-ID: References: <1340468946 DOT 24539 DOT 26 DOT camel AT corn DOT betterworld DOT us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081209 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.6.0 In-Reply-To: <1340468946.24539.26.camel@corn.betterworld.us> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 6/23/2012 11:29 AM, Ross Boylan wrote: > Can non-cygwin applications "see" the ports ssh in cygwin sets up for > forwarding? I did some tests on Windows 7 and found that, although the > forwarding was clearly in effect for commands I ran in the cygwin shell, > it did not seem to be accessible to the regular Windows version of > Thunderbird. Yes. I use a tunnel from home to work, and by use I mean Firefox to open pages/applications I don't want to expose to the Internet. It should be the same with Thunderbird, of course the port changes, but you connect to localhost:143 (IMAP), localhost:25 (SMTP), or whatever. If you can connect with telnet to those ports, then TBird shouldn't have a problem. -- René Berber -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple