X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.2 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20120611145532.GD4004@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
References: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAH3PqnIBVHtCiVMVjN0ExZLigAAAEAAAAJXIkaLIcH5Pn+g+gRSa2KoBAAAAAA==@expertise.cl>	<20120608184641 DOT GA13771 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>	<4FD32DC5 DOT 10703 AT gmail DOT com>	<20120609155700 DOT GA21988 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>	<0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A20A770AB443 AT NIHMLBX02 DOT nih DOT gov>	<1591225778 DOT 20120611180232 AT mtu-net DOT ru>	<4FD6045E DOT 6020000 AT sister-shadow DOT de>	<20120611144627 DOT GB4004 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>	<4FD605DB DOT 9080606 AT sister-shadow DOT de>	<20120611145532 DOT GD4004 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 17:03:20 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKw7uVgfEUtUvKnKMt8igc12fSgTnRf_w80Y1HDJNWte26XjQw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Trusted Software Vendor
From: =?UTF-8?Q?V=C3=A1clav_Zeman?= <vhaisman AT gmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id q5BF3hxH017211

On 11 June 2012 16:55, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 04:51:07PM +0200, Otto Meta wrote:
>>cgf wrote:
>>> Out of curiosity would downloading setup.exe using wget also work
>>>around the problem?
>>
>>Most likely.  I don't think wget cares about protecting Windows users
>>from their own stupidity.  If you use wget, you should know what you're
>>doing.
>>
>>How about you just give it a try?
>
> Er, I don't have this problem.  I wasn't the one reporting it.
Downloading setup.exe with wget has another problem. The downloaded
file is missing the +x bit, IIRC.

-- 
VZ

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple