X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.4 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: rodrigo AT rodrigobotafogo DOT com
From: Rodrigo Botafogo <rodrigo AT rodrigobotafogo DOT com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:49:14 +0100
Message-ID: <CAAKc=GDtuC-QOBeoVBzFNsNMRg71GMgsaP_9-2qpECGcRs5YPg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: child_info_fork::abort:
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id q5BDnx26014248

>>     0 [main] ruby 8140 child_info_fork::abort: address space needed
>> by 'cygnetcdf-7.dll' (0x420000) is already occupied
>>     0 [main] ruby 6960 child_info_fork::abort: address space needed
>> by 'cygnetcdf-7.dll' (0x420000) is already occupied
>>     0 [main] ruby 5692 child_info_fork::abort: address space needed
>> by 'cygnetcdf-7.dll' (0x420000) is already occupied
>>      0 [main] ruby 7748 child_info_fork::abort: address space needed
>> by 'cygnetcdf-7.dll' (0x420000) is already occupied

>> Similar messages appear when I try to open gnuplot processes.  I´ve
>> already done rebaseall.


>> Thanks for any help


> As ruby is not linked to netcdf,
> I presume that you are using some ruby additional packages,
> could your issue be related to the same problem :

> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.cygwin/126151/focus=126196

> Regards
> Marco


Marco,

Thank you for your reply.  Doing what you suggested seems to have
solved the problem.

Ryan,

Thanks also for your reply.  In your reply you say that if the system
has a very large number of DLL rebase might not work. Just for
curiosity, what is a large number of DLL?  When do I run a risk of
having problems with rebaseall?


Cheers,


Rodrigo

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple