X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 15:42:50 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: [cron-config] Possible issue with administrators group ? From: AZ 9901 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Hello, I am looking at the /bin/cron-config script. Line 627, we can find : elif net localgroup "${_admingroup}" | grep -Eiq "^${username}.?$"; then Why .? at the end of the regexp ? "^${username}.?$" We could have problems if for example we already have "user1" in administrators group, and cron user is "user2". "user2" would then not be added to the administrators group. Do we have some buggy output from "net localgroup" on some Windows versions to use .? at the end of the regexp ? On my Windows XP, using grep -iq "^${username}$" works perfectly. What about other Windows versions ? Thank you very much ! Best regards, Ben -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple