X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4FBFE720.9050502@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 15:10:08 -0500 From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: 20120523: bug in fork/exec References: <4FBF4233 DOT 8040303 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <20120525094033 DOT GD4225 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> In-Reply-To: <20120525094033.GD4225@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 2012-05-25 04:40, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On May 25 03:26, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: >> With the 20120523 snapshot, if a process attempts to fork/exec > > Which snapshot shows this effect first? Ouch, it starts with 20120309. FWIW, here is the fork() code I discovered this with: http://git.gnome.org/browse/glib/tree/glib/gspawn.c?id=2.32.3 Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple