X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,TW_SV X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 15:05:11 +0200 From: Denis Excoffier To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Cc: marco atzeri Subject: Re: svn --version Message-ID: <20120525130535.GA3156@qp9482> References: <20120524070719 DOT GA4640 AT qp9482> <20120524081202 DOT GT9200 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20120524092232 DOT GA896 AT qp9482> <20120524121850 DOT GC18736 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20120525121735 DOT GA3124 AT qp9482> <4FBF7B96 DOT 4080004 AT gmail DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FBF7B96.4080004@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 02:31:18PM +0200, marco atzeri wrote: >> On 5/25/2012 2:17 PM, Denis Excoffier wrote: >> > >> >My experience showed that my personal fork errors were never solved by >> >autorebasing. In my case, autorebasing brought difficulties with xz >> >that i don't understand and difficulties with my ~100 >> >home-built DLLs (ie i would have to rebase them also, but "manually"). >> >> find /usr/local -name "*.dll" > your_dll_list >> rebaseall -T your_dll_list Indeed, easy in theory. But there will be exceptional DLL's that i will not want to rebase, and the command line will contain more characters and i'll have to find a place where to store it. Good news is that i suppose it will run with Cygwin running (since the DLLs from /usr/bin would have already been rebased) and i will be able to use this script like any other. But i will also need to trigger this script as soon as one of my DLL's is modified etc. Finally i will have to build several scripts around it, that would be for Cygwin consumption only (i have to use other installations, like Solaris and MacOSX, that don't have this DLL problem). Again, easy in theory, but, in my situation i repeat, not worth the noise, and 'xz -9e' will still be broken (so i'll have to build my own xz with -Bstatic etc.). Denis Excoffier. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple