X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4FBF5AE4.20305@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 12:11:48 +0200
From: Noel Grandin <noelgrandin AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: "emacs -nw" hangs in a terminal
References: <4FBA8EA0 DOT 4040905 AT cornell DOT edu> <20120522112828 DOT GA9200 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4FBB7BA6 DOT 9000409 AT cornell DOT edu> <20120522134119 DOT GB9200 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20120522134932 DOT GC9200 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4FBCD166 DOT 8080101 AT cornell DOT edu> <20120523141538 DOT GI9200 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4FBD08B0 DOT 50209 AT cornell DOT edu> <20120523160235 DOT GK9200 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4FBE26C8 DOT 1000008 AT cornell DOT edu> <20120525100321 DOT GF4225 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To: <20120525100321.GF4225@calimero.vinschen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com


On 2012-05-25 12:03, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> I'll look further into this, but I am wondering about this: Is the new
> Fsignal/Fthrow implementation so much different than the old one in
> emacs 23.x? If not, why does it work in 23.x? Any chance 24.x produces
> a stack or heap corruption? Double free or something? And then again,
> do we know if 24.x works on older Cygwin release or snapshots? If it's
> a Cygwin problem, it might help to nail it down. Corinna

Might be worth running it under Dr Memory to check this.
http://www.drmemory.org/

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple