X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-13.2 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EAC+8u0+rRDoJ/2dsb2JhbABEtBKBB4IWAQEEEgEdCjQbAgEIIgIEGAYBSAENAQEEGxqHawGaJ596iwgaggWCPGIDiEONaIx9gWSDCoE/
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"
Subject: RE: Is the Latest Release of Cygwin supported on Windows Server 8/2012
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 09:58:28 -0700
Message-ID: <70952A932255A2489522275A628B97C31348C617@xmb-sjc-233.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <jpemgs$6pk$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <70952A932255A2489522275A628B97C31348C437 AT xmb-sjc-233 DOT amer DOT cisco DOT com> <jpegff$t8s$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org> <jpegob$t8s$2 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org> <70952A932255A2489522275A628B97C31348C47C AT xmb-sjc-233 DOT amer DOT cisco DOT com> <jpemgs$6pk$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org>
From: "Matt Seitz (matseitz)" <matseitz AT cisco DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id q4MGwuC0000360

What is a better way I can give context (and credit) when I am
responding to a message, without implying that I expect a reply from the
original author?

I've been a Usenet user since 1988, and I've never heard of the
convention of "quoting implies request for reply".  Replies from the
original author are always welcome, but I don't necessarily expect them.
Maybe I just missed the memo....

On the receiving side, if I didn't want to respond to a Usenet message,
I just didn't.  If I wasn't interested in a thread anymore, I just
stopped reading it, or put it in my "kill" file.

I read the Cygwin mailing list using the gmane.org newsfeed, too.  But I
was told that replying via my newsreader (Outlook Newsreader) messes up
the e'mail threading.  So now I subscribe to the digest as well, so that
I can reply to the SMTP e'mail instead of replying to the gmane NNTP
post.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple