X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Andrew DeFaria <Andrew AT DeFaria DOT com>
Subject: Re: Is the Latest Release of Cygwin supported on Windows Server 8/2012
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 15:48:42 -0700
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <jpegob$t8s$2@dough.gmane.org>
References: <70952A932255A2489522275A628B97C31348C437 AT xmb-sjc-233 DOT amer DOT cisco DOT com> <jpegff$t8s$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
In-Reply-To: <jpegff$t8s$1@dough.gmane.org>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 5/21/2012 3:43 PM, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
> On 5/21/2012 3:15 PM, Matt Seitz (matseitz) wrote:
>> I don't think Warren's note said there was a 4GB 32-bit executable.  
>> I think it said a 4GB 32-bit executable would be the worst case 
>> scenario for 64-bit executable size bloat.
> It might be. What I was saying was if it doesn't exist (and probably 
> isn't likely to exist anytime soon) then I don't personally worry 
> about it. YMMV.
>>> Well have you considered the following: "Anyway I think I'm
>>> done with this topic"? I didn't think so.
>> Are you saying Warren should not post a response to the mailing list,
>> just because you personally are no longer interested in the discussion?
> No I'm saying he should response my post, citing me as if to expect 
> and answer from me when I am no longer interested in the topic.
I mean: He should *not* response to my post...
-- 
Andrew DeFaria <http://defaria.com>
Oops. My brain just hit a bad sector.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple