X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: jojelino Subject: Re: Interpreting a gdb backtrace Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 07:45:17 +0900 Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <4FB6BA5F DOT 6060906 AT cornell DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.2; rv:15.0) Gecko/15.0 Thunderbird/15.0a1 In-Reply-To: <4FB6BA5F.6060906@cornell.edu> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 2012-05-19 AM 6:08, Ken Brown wrote: > I'm trying to debug an emacs crash and am having trouble getting a > useful backtrace after the crash. Here's an example: > > #0 0x00289c08 in ?? () > No symbol table info available. > #1 0x007ba148 in _malloc_mutex () > No symbol table info available. > #2 0x00000000 in ?? () > No symbol table info available. > i think you should provide symbol file of emacs to gdb. if it was stripped, you had better to build emacs from source code with -g (at least gcc 4.5 for CFI that gdb need to backtrace the stack frame with ease). -- Regards. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple