X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/mailhop/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX19NKlqchUuaqigiBklwqRbi Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 19:23:20 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [feature] alias "more" to "less" Message-ID: <20120517232320.GB21519@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4FACCED0 DOT 709 AT gmail DOT com> <20120515172812 DOT GB12873 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20120515195347 DOT GB14665 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 04:13:32PM -0700, Andrew DeFaria wrote: >On 5/15/2012 4:57 PM, Andrew DeFaria wrote: >> On 5/15/2012 12:53 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> Ok, fair enough. We're also not going to add an alias for more to >>> every single shipping shell. As was mentioned in the first response >>> to the original post there is actually a more in util-linux package. >>> That should be reason enough not to add a simple alias/symlink. >> I guess that's also fair enough... >Went to update my Cygwin archive and decided to include more in my local >package dir. So I search for it and I find nothing but xmore. I tried >looking in Utils and couldn't find anything about util-linux or even >linux. Went cygwin.com and Search Packages. Looked for more. I don't >find any package that has it. I do see things about less. > >OK so where's more hiding? Wow. We're still talking about this? It really isn't that hard. Just type "util-linux" in the search box for setup.exe. If you're looking for the package which holds more.exe then search for more.exe in the package search. You'll then find util-linux. There are enough packages in the distro which include the word "more" that you won't find util-linux in the first thirty matches. It is on the main search page though if you scroll down. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple