X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RCVD_IN_NIX_SPAM X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/mailhop/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1+uTBJ5tcfhMFrK1sWtxBqe Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 15:48:13 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Someone is pretending to be some Cygwin's support Message-ID: <20120515194813.GA14665@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20120514143614 DOT GA29237 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20120514144119 DOT GB29237 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <87obpqbr5n DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <20120514192108 DOT GB28610 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20120515171740 DOT GA12873 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <87havhux69 DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87havhux69.fsf@Rainer.invalid> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 08:16:46PM +0200, Achim Gratz wrote: >Christopher Faylor writes: >> It shouldn't have to tell you what domain to use for postmaster for this >> mailing list. > >The four words "for this mailing list" would have been enough, thank you. If you'd actually used the two words "postmaster where?" it would have been obvious that you hadn't missed the request to send to postmaster but were just not clear on where to send the message. >> You did manage to figure it out but, unfortunately, your forwarded >> header shows that the email response likely came as the result of a >> gmane post so there is nothing that we can do about it here. > >As I said before, the messages are not necessarily harvested directly >via the account that pretends to be sending the mail. It would be >likely that he is subscribed under a different name. Uh, yeah. Of course he's subscribed under a different name. That's the whole reason for asking for complete email with headers. If this was as simple as just unsubscribing the posted email address then this discussion would not have been happening. >Although the messages may be harvested in a different manner, that >seems unlikely since the reply to any of my messages so far has been >almost simultaneous with the appearance of the message on the list >server (Gmane for instance posts them quite a bit later usually). That >my message to the list has been posted through Gmane seems to have >nothing to do with it. I thought I detected signs in the email that you sent me that the email was harvested directly from gmane. That is certainly possible. However, FWIW, we've also received another message from a much less prickly individual which did not have any gmane markers. So, the investigation continues. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple