X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=eq5dP/VX c=1 sm=0 a=BYtf1cvtHDi0yqkswXf3ig==:17 a=N1BqOr4lPycA:10 a=enQhnZMI4hwA:10 a=05ChyHeVI94A:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=w_pzkKWiAAAA:8 a=xyGQxoX4HjATa4OiR1sA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=buB1NfXUTBUA:10 a=IfQ-iFkkCvMA:10 a=BYtf1cvtHDi0yqkswXf3ig==:117 Message-ID: <4FA3FE56.5030504@cfl.rr.com> Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 09:05:42 -0700 From: "eric_justin_allan AT cfl DOT rr DOT com" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120429 Firefox/12.0 SeaMonkey/2.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cygwin Mailing List Subject: Re: Question about kill References: <4FA3CA9D DOT 3040408 AT cfl DOT rr DOT com> <4FA3C2C5 DOT 7020306 AT gmail DOT com> <4FA3C77B DOT 2040901 AT redhat DOT com> <4FA3C88B DOT 50103 AT gmail DOT com> In-Reply-To: <4FA3C88B.50103@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Well kill program_name didn't work and kill -9 is pretty much what I am looking for. Does it matter if you are gonna overwrite the program if you use kill -9? marco atzeri wrote: > On 5/4/2012 2:11 PM, Eric Blake wrote: >> On 05/04/2012 05:51 AM, marco atzeri wrote: >> >>> >>> Usually >>> kill -9 your_program_name >>> >>> works very well >> >> Usually 'kill -9 your_program' is overkill; it forcefully terminates the >> program with SIGKILL, which means the program has no chance to clean up >> after itself, and can leave your file system in a mess for the next time >> you attempt to run the program. You should reserve this for a >> last-ditch effort, only after the nicer 'kill your_program' (SIGTERM) or >> 'kill -s INT' (SIGINT) both result in no action. >> > > I had the impression he needs the last resort... > > -- > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > > -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple