X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 10:16:26 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: configure --prerfix=/ Message-ID: <20120503081626.GI3031@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4FA21A6D DOT 3040500 AT samsung DOT com> <20120503072324 DOT GF3031 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4FA23ACF DOT 5020608 AT samsung DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FA23ACF.5020608@samsung.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On May 3 11:59, Fedin Pavel wrote: > On 03.05.2012 11:23, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >Yes, that's a bug in autoconf. It doesn't fully respect POSIX pathname > >rules. What happens is that it simply attaches pathnames with a leading > >slash to the prefix, > > Ah, yes, really, i simply forgot this. > In fact IMHO it's not a bug in autoconf. We supply prefix without a > trailing slash, so concatenation is ok here. Root directory would be > expressed by empty prefix, really. Just i forgot about UNC paths... > Should be noticed somewhere in easy-to-reach FAQ i think... Actually it's noted in the first paragraph in http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using.html#using-pathnames and UNC paths are discussed throughout the section. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple