X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: gdm AT linuxpro DOT co DOT za In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 19:16:53 +1200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: look to secure cygwin email delivery From: Gregory Machin To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id q427HKda021107 Lol not my idea to give users admin rites. I have 10 years worth of bad admin to put rite, without slowing down the developers work :-( On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Andrew DeFaria wrote: > On 05/01/2012 10:03 PM, Gregory Machin wrote: >> >> Thanks . >> I have tests as you suggest , so long as the user does not have admin >> privileges. >> >> The problem I have is most users have local admin rites on their >> machines. Which make it difficult to secure . >> > Gee. I wonder where I've heard that before. Oh well. > > -- > Andrew DeFaria > Why do toasters always have a setting that burns the toast to a horrible > crisp no one would eat? > > > > -- > Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple