X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2BF01EB27B56CC478AD6E5A0A28931F2044EB02E@A1DAL1SWPES19MB.ams.acs-inc.net> References: <4F9B77B1 DOT 9070200 AT gmail DOT com> <2BF01EB27B56CC478AD6E5A0A28931F2044EB02E AT A1DAL1SWPES19MB DOT ams DOT acs-inc DOT net> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:14:26 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Cygwin 1.7.14-2 setup.exe v2.772 broken? From: Earnie Boyd To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Nellis, Kenneth wrote: > From: marco atzeri >> BLODA is still a possibility, I have Symantec installed; or there is >> subtle bug handling the missing files on the website >> >> Marco > > I had understood BLODA to affect Cygwin programs that rely on code > in cygwin1.dll that tries to bridge the imperfect divide between > the Unix and Windows architectures; it therefore would not affect > pure Windows programs such as setup.exe. Have I misunderstood? Yes, you have misunderstood. We point people to the BLODA FAQ at Cygwin at mingw.org which has nothing to do with Cygwin. BLODA can affect any DLL or EXE. -- Earnie -- https://sites.google.com/site/earnieboyd -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple