X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_CG,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4F9C3824.4090203@comcast.net> Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 14:34:12 -0400 From: Ken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120422 Firefox/12.0 SeaMonkey/2.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cygwin 1.7.14-2 setup.exe v2.772 broken? References: <4F9B1EF7 DOT 1080501 AT comcast DOT net> <4F9B6DC1 DOT 3030303 AT gmail DOT com> <4F9B77B1 DOT 9070200 AT gmail DOT com> <4F9C22B1 DOT 5000405 AT comcast DOT net> <20120428180621 DOT GA23030 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20120428182429 DOT GA7308 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> In-Reply-To: <20120428182429.GA7308@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 08:06:21PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> On Apr 28 13:02, Ken wrote: >>> marco atzeri wrote: >>>> BLODA is still a possibility, I have Symantec installed; or there >>>> is subtle bug handling the missing files on the website >>>> >>>> Marco >>>> >>>> >>> Hi Marco, >>> >>> Nice to see that you can reproduce the problem! I neglected to >>> mention that this seems to occur immediately after the initial >>> setup.ini download (even to a fresh, non-cached, local folder), but >>> it would seem that you have reproduced what I am experiencing. As I >>> mentioned, the download operations work fine with the previous >>> version of setup.exe (from 1.7.13); which is why I question whether >>> or not something is slightly awry in the new version. >> There's no change between 2.769 and 2.772 which would explain any change >> in handling the .ini file. > Yeah, ditto, but... > >> I installed 2.772 on my systems as soon as it was available and I don't >> see any such issue using my local mirror. Did you try another mirror? Yes, as I mentioned in my initial post, I tried a few different mirrors with the same result. > I can duplicate this. I'll try to fix it today. > > cgf > > Excellent! I look forward to the fix. :-) Thank you! Ken -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple