X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4F9816F6.30505@cs.umass.edu> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:23:34 -0400 From: Eliot Moss Reply-To: moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120420 Thunderbird/12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: xargs: Why does order of command line switches matter? References: <1335349788 DOT 2627 DOT 140661067092681 DOT 0CBF054A AT webmail DOT messagingengine DOT com> <4F97DA45 DOT 9050100 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu> <0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A20A6E562BB0 AT NIHMLBX02 DOT nih DOT gov> In-Reply-To: <0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A20A6E562BB0@NIHMLBX02.nih.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com >> From man xargs: > > BUGS > The -L option is incompatible with the -I option, but perhaps should > not be. Thanks, Barry! Clearly I (we) should have RT(F)M! E -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple