X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4F96E00B.7000401@wanadoo.fr> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 19:16:59 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=E9r=F4me_Bouat?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120313 Thunderbird/3.1.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: lzma instead of bzip2 for packages compression ? References: <4F96D2FD DOT 1040907 AT wanadoo DOT fr> <4F96D45D DOT 70204 AT redhat DOT com> In-Reply-To: <4F96D45D.70204@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In case you want to use xz, the '--extreme' option prevides a higher compression ratio than lzma with the same memory requirement for decompression. Le 24/04/2012 18:27, Eric Blake a écrit : > On 04/24/2012 10:21 AM, Jérôme Bouat wrote: >> Hello, >> >> >> The cygwin 'tar.bz2' packages are created once and broadcasted to many >> hosts. >> >> The lzma compression is fast for decompression. Could we possibly get >> the packages with lzma compression ? > > lzma is obsolete. If anything, we want xz. > -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple