X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_YG,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Andrew DeFaria Subject: Re: Problems with nfs Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 07:06:18 -0700 Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: <4F9639D5 DOT 60200 AT samsung DOT com> <4F9653E9 DOT 2090307 AT samsung DOT com> <20120424073351 DOT GC17620 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120309 Thunderbird/11.0 In-Reply-To: <20120424073351.GC17620@calimero.vinschen.de> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 04/24/2012 12:33 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > The problem is that the NFS-server package in Cygwin is orphaned since > the maintainer has moved on. If somebody is interested to pick up > maintainance of that package, you're welcome. See > http://cygwin.com/setup.html for more information. The cygport > packaging method is the preferred packaging method these days. Why don't we have an nfs-client package? Same reason - no maintainer? I would think an nfs-client would be much more useful than an nfs-server package. -- Andrew DeFaria Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple