X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4F896504.3030006@cornell.edu> References: <4F896504 DOT 3030006 AT cornell DOT edu> Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:37:00 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: gcc: turning off large-address awareness From: Earnie Boyd To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id q3EGbO5t016258 On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 7:52 AM, Ken Brown wrote: > For testing purposes, I'd like to build without large-address awareness. >  What's the right way to do that?  I tried > >   LDFLAGS=-Wl,--no-large-address-aware > > and > >   LDFLAGS=-Wl,--disable-large-address-aware > > but both resulted in "unrecognized option" errors from ld. You specify --large-address-aware if you want it and don't specify if you don't want it. I see nothing to reverse the option. -- Earnie -- https://sites.google.com/site/earnieboyd -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple