X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_NX X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20120412195110.GB17154@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> References: <1581884843 DOT 20120412191907 AT mail DOT ru> <20120412194410 DOT GA17154 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20120412195110 DOT GB17154 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:56:14 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Win2000 compatibility From: Earnie Boyd To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id q3CJuWAl020706 On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 03:44:10PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 03:35:12PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote: >>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:48 AM, jojelino wrote: >>>> -- >>>> GetModuleHandleEx is known to be supported in minimum winxp (0x0501), >>>> according to >>>> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms683200(v=vs.85).aspx >>>> by the way, in winbase.h, it is enabled with minimum of win2k. which should >>>> be fixed. >>>> #if (_WIN32_WINNT >= 0x0500) >>>> WINBASEAPI BOOL WINAPI GetModuleHandleExA(DWORD,LPCSTR,HMODULE*); >>>> WINBASEAPI BOOL WINAPI GetModuleHandleExW(DWORD,LPCWSTR,HMODULE*); >>>> #endif >>>> >>> >>>Please report that at >>>http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=102435&group_id=2435&func=browse >>>so we can fix it before Chris gets out the next release. >> >>Huh?  No.  Don't do that.  The above has nothing to do with Cygwin.  Please >>don't co-opt this list for MinGW concerns. > > Sorry.  Nevermind.  You were referring to the winbase.h issue not the > setup.exe issue. Apology accepted. Yes, winbase.h issue was my reference. Funny I just read an anecdote about Responding vs Reacting. ;) -- Earnie -- https://sites.google.com/site/earnieboyd -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple