X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM,GENERIC_IXHASH,KAM_THEBAT,KHOP_THREADED,MIME_BASE64_BLANKS,TW_YG X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 14:29:07 +0400 From: Andrey Repin Reply-To: Andrey Repin Message-ID: <136805226.20120406142907@mtu-net.ru> To: Corinna Vinschen Subject: Re: "dst_lib_init: openssl failure" after yesterday's update In-Reply-To: <20120406082057.GB13898@calimero.vinschen.de> References: <4F7DFDCA DOT 8090906 AT cygwin DOT com> <20120406082057 DOT GB13898 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1251 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id q36AYHpv011198 Greetings, Corinna Vinschen! >> After running dig and host with strace I found that they were trying >> to open the file "C:\cygwin\lib\engines\libgost.so", which didn't >> exist on my system; I saw "geterrno_from_win_error: windows error 126 >> == errno 2" in the trace, when the binaries were trying to open this >> file. I found out that the libgost.so file belongs to the openssl >> package, which indeed, wasn't installed. After I installed it, all is >> good. You're right. This is a library providing Russian GOST cryptographic algorithms (ГОСТ - Государственный Стандарт) for OpenSSL package. >> Maybe some binary requirements changed and the package dependencies >> weren't updated to reflect this? I mean, after upgrading bind, the >> setup tool should have installed openssl as a dependency. > That depends. > After reading that problem I'm wondering if it's not the fault of the > openssl packaging. The runtime shared libs cygssl and cygcrypto are in > the libopensslXXX package, but the engines are in the openssl package. > Yaakov, do you just change the dependency of the bind package or do you > think the engines should be moved to the libopensslXXX package? I don't think it makes much sense separating one executable from twelve libs. -- WBR, Andrey Repin (anrdaemon AT freemail DOT ru) 06.04.2012, <14:23> Sorry for my terrible english...