X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT,KHOP_THREADED
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 05:35:58 +0400
From: Andrey Repin <anrdaemon AT freemail DOT ru>
Reply-To: Andrey Repin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Message-ID: <696106181.20120404053558@mtu-net.ru>
To: Eric Blake <eblake AT redhat DOT com>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Is this supposed to work this way?
In-Reply-To: <4F7B9C81.4060209@redhat.com>
References: <0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A20A6536CB91 AT NIHMLBX02 DOT nih DOT gov> <602324786 DOT 20120404044708 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <4F7B9C81 DOT 4060209 AT redhat DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Greetings, Eric Blake!

>>> Is there a reason that something like the following wouldn't work?
>> 
>>> if [ -f /bin/cygwin1.dll ]
>> 
>> Hm. Turned out, this is more reliable check, than
>> test "$OSTYPE" = "cygwin" && ...
>> 
>> But, oh, so much for consistency...
>> 
>> Question to Cygwin staff: shouldn't $OSTYPE be declared for Cygwin programs,
>> even if they are not started from Cygwin shell? Is this at all possible?

> No, not possible - $OSTYPE is not standardized, so there's no point in
> expecting cygwin to provide it (of course, you can export it in your
> ~/.bashrc).  Furthermore, even if cygwin exported it, the moment your
> cygwin process starts a non-cygwin process, that process would also see
> the same setting.

That raises another question: what is the standard way of detecting OS type?
uname -o
?


--
WBR,
Andrey Repin (anrdaemon AT freemail DOT ru) 04.04.2012, <05:34>

Sorry for my terrible english...


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple