X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS
X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/mailhop/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX19/iyKAunbJvZHGXbEp2cE/
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 14:54:25 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] CALL FOR TESTING: Cygwin 1.7.12
Message-ID: <20120402185425.GB9912@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <announce DOT 20120330113350 DOT GA12620 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4F76F230 DOT 5050302 AT towo DOT net> <20120402080721 DOT GC8014 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20120402170559 DOT GD7418 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4F79F512 DOT 6030006 AT towo DOT net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4F79F512.6030006@towo.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 08:50:58PM +0200, Thomas Wolff wrote:
>Am 02.04.2012 19:05, schrieb Christopher Faylor:
>> I don't see how we could accommodate this without switching the console
>> to "uncooked" mode.  And, as you say, that would have massive effects
>> on the console code.  I don't think it's worth that much change for such
>> a relatively unused feature.  Especially since it would make console I/O
>> slower.
>I don't see how it should make anything slower.

Maybe we are already opening console in character-at-a-time mode so that
we can deal properly with CTRL-D so maybe it wouldn't be an issue.
Nevertheless, your patch isn't right, as I mentioned in cygwin-patches.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple