X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4F7404BA.9010704@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 01:44:10 -0500 From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Thunderbird/11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin-ports git access over http? References: <87limkt1cg DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> In-Reply-To: <87limkt1cg.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 2012-03-29 00:36, Achim Gratz wrote: > I'm behind a firewall at work that only allows HTTP access through, so > is there a way clone cygwin-ports over HTTP? If not, is there already a > Git mirror that provides such access? I'm afraid not; Sourceforge does not provide that as an option. > I can clone the individual projects one by one, though. Obviously it > would be much nicer if there was a superproject to clone that had those > already added as subprojects... Given the ever-increasing number of packages in Ports, just maintaining that would take some effort unless I can automate it. But do you really need *all* of Ports git? Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple