X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:33:10 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: rebase-4.1.0-1
Message-ID: <20120328073310.GD25716@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <announce DOT 20120327014025 DOT GA3344 AT tishler DOT net> <4F712CFC DOT 9050603 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca> <20120327083621 DOT GA30721 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4F724CD6 DOT 8020600 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4F724CD6.8020600@users.sourceforge.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Mar 28 07:27, JonY wrote:
> On 3/27/2012 16:36, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Mar 26 22:59, Ryan Johnson wrote:
> >> On 26/03/2012 9:40 PM, Jason Tishler wrote:
> >>> New News:
> >>> === ====
> >>> I have updated the version of rebase to 4.1.0-1.  The tarballs should be
> >>> available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
> >>>
> >>> The following are the changes since the previous release:
> >>>
> >>>     * Add rebase/rebaseall touch file (i.e., -t option) support.
> >>>
> >>>     * Add rebaseall setup (i.e., -p option) support.
> >>>
> >>>     * Add .oct to the default rebaseall suffix list.
> >> I've been meaning to ask... but maybe the above-mentioned -p flag
> >> obsoletes it now: What's the most efficient way to rebase after
> >> running setup? We've had the rebase db for a while now, so running
> >> rebaseall seems like overkill. Only the newly downloaded dlls need
> > 
> > Now that the new rebase is out, I'm going to create an _autorebase
> > package which will automatically call rebaseall at the end of a
> > successful run of setup, if that run also updated existing DLLs or
> > came with new DLLs.
> 
> If I don't want it to run? I've never had any need to rebase DLLs on my
> Win7 64bit machine.

It doesn't hurt either.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple