X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4F724CD6.8020600@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 07:27:18 +0800 From: JonY User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080213 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: rebase-4.1.0-1 References: <4F712CFC DOT 9050603 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca> <20120327083621 DOT GA30721 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> In-Reply-To: <20120327083621.GA30721@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig1FB0D606FE2D492A5CF492B9" X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com --------------enig1FB0D606FE2D492A5CF492B9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 3/27/2012 16:36, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Mar 26 22:59, Ryan Johnson wrote: >> On 26/03/2012 9:40 PM, Jason Tishler wrote: >>> New News: >>> =3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D >>> I have updated the version of rebase to 4.1.0-1. The tarballs should be >>> available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly. >>> >>> The following are the changes since the previous release: >>> >>> * Add rebase/rebaseall touch file (i.e., -t option) support. >>> >>> * Add rebaseall setup (i.e., -p option) support. >>> >>> * Add .oct to the default rebaseall suffix list. >> I've been meaning to ask... but maybe the above-mentioned -p flag >> obsoletes it now: What's the most efficient way to rebase after >> running setup? We've had the rebase db for a while now, so running >> rebaseall seems like overkill. Only the newly downloaded dlls need >=20 > Now that the new rebase is out, I'm going to create an _autorebase > package which will automatically call rebaseall at the end of a > successful run of setup, if that run also updated existing DLLs or > came with new DLLs. If I don't want it to run? I've never had any need to rebase DLLs on my Win7 64bit machine. --------------enig1FB0D606FE2D492A5CF492B9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) iEYEARECAAYFAk9yTPcACgkQp56AKe10wHdPjQCeKJiaZGttYLt0fe1MMwiFywGt Mc4AnjpGWe76lmmUAN8yzxAmRF+apsBO =F5At -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig1FB0D606FE2D492A5CF492B9--