X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4F7230FD.7080500@t-online.de> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:28:29 +0200 From: Christian Franke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Firefox/10.0.2 SeaMonkey/2.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: clock_getres(CLOCK_REALTIME, .) may return an outdated and too high resolution References: <4F6A5D42 DOT 3030108 AT t-online DOT de> <20120322093340 DOT GW18032 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4F6B65A7 DOT 9080605 AT t-online DOT de> <20120326085159 DOT GJ2425 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4F70A0C9 DOT 5060208 AT t-online DOT de> <20120327091051 DOT GB30721 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4F72007D DOT 6080503 AT t-online DOT de> <20120327182823 DOT GV30721 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4F720E19 DOT 5000809 AT t-online DOT de> <20120327205050 DOT GB25716 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> In-Reply-To: <20120327205050.GB25716@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Mar 27 20:59, Christian Franke wrote: >> Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> On Mar 27 20:01, Christian Franke wrote: >>>> Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>>>> On Mar 26 19:00, Christian Franke wrote: >>>>>> Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>>>>>> I see your point, but what bugs me a bit is the fact that >>>>>>> clock_getres(CLOCK_REALTIME) and clock_setres(CLOCK_REALTIME) will >>>>>>> always return the same value coarsest, regardless what value has been set. >>>>>> If clock_setres was called and succeeded, then clock_getres(.) >>>>>> should return the value set before. >>>>>> >>>>>> If clock_setres was not called, the coarsest value is IMO the only >>>>>> value that can be guaranteed. >>>>>> >>>>>> The actual value returned by NtQueryTimerResolution is simply >>>>>> useless in this context: It is the minimum of all resolutions >>>>>> currently set by all running processes. It may change at any time. >>>>>> There is apparently no way the query the current setting of the >>>>>> current process. >>>>> Uh, right, I misunderstood. I reverted the change to clock_setres. >>>> Sorry, I probably forgot to mention that NtSetTimerResolution >>>> returns the same useless actual value than NtQueryTimerResolution. >>>> >>>> I would suggest: >>>> >>>> status = NtSetTimerResolution (period, TRUE,&actual); >>>> if (!NT_SUCCESS (status)) >>>> { ... return -1; } >>>> - minperiod = actual; >>>> + minperiod = period; >>> But that's not right. The "actual" value is not useless, but the value >>> the resolution has actually been set to. >> No, again this is the minimum of all resolutions currently set by >> all processes. >> >> >>> The OS just doesn't support >>> arbitrary values for the period. >>> >> Yes - but in 'actual' a smaller value than the value set for the >> current process may be returned. > Hmpf, ok. Boy is that ugly. Yes, aka broken by design :-) There should be a function to query the actual setting for the current process only. But there is none. > Is there a chance that actual is bigger > than period? In that case we should perhaps set minperiod like this: > > minperiod = MAX (actual, period); According to some experiments this can only happen if period < finest. In this case NtSetTimerResolution also succeeds and returns actual == finest. Christian -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple