X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4F720E19.5000809@t-online.de> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:59:37 +0200 From: Christian Franke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Firefox/10.0.2 SeaMonkey/2.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: clock_getres(CLOCK_REALTIME, .) may return an outdated and too high resolution References: <4F6A5D42 DOT 3030108 AT t-online DOT de> <20120322093340 DOT GW18032 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4F6B65A7 DOT 9080605 AT t-online DOT de> <20120326085159 DOT GJ2425 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4F70A0C9 DOT 5060208 AT t-online DOT de> <20120327091051 DOT GB30721 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4F72007D DOT 6080503 AT t-online DOT de> <20120327182823 DOT GV30721 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> In-Reply-To: <20120327182823.GV30721@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Mar 27 20:01, Christian Franke wrote: >> Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> On Mar 26 19:00, Christian Franke wrote: >>>> Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>>>> I see your point, but what bugs me a bit is the fact that >>>>> clock_getres(CLOCK_REALTIME) and clock_setres(CLOCK_REALTIME) will >>>>> always return the same value coarsest, regardless what value has been set. >>>> If clock_setres was called and succeeded, then clock_getres(.) >>>> should return the value set before. >>>> >>>> If clock_setres was not called, the coarsest value is IMO the only >>>> value that can be guaranteed. >>>> >>>> The actual value returned by NtQueryTimerResolution is simply >>>> useless in this context: It is the minimum of all resolutions >>>> currently set by all running processes. It may change at any time. >>>> There is apparently no way the query the current setting of the >>>> current process. >>> Uh, right, I misunderstood. I reverted the change to clock_setres. >> Sorry, I probably forgot to mention that NtSetTimerResolution >> returns the same useless actual value than NtQueryTimerResolution. >> >> I would suggest: >> >> status = NtSetTimerResolution (period, TRUE,&actual); >> if (!NT_SUCCESS (status)) >> { ... return -1; } >> - minperiod = actual; >> + minperiod = period; > But that's not right. The "actual" value is not useless, but the value > the resolution has actually been set to. No, again this is the minimum of all resolutions currently set by all processes. > The OS just doesn't support > arbitrary values for the period. > Yes - but in 'actual' a smaller value than the value set for the current process may be returned. Christian -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple