X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:29:18 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: rebase-4.1.0-1 Message-ID: <20120327152918.GL30721@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4F712CFC DOT 9050603 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca> <20120327083621 DOT GA30721 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4F71DA4F DOT 1060105 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F71DA4F.1060105@cs.utoronto.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Mar 27 11:18, Ryan Johnson wrote: > The problem > right now -- at least in my naive invocations -- is that rebaseall > attempts to rebase things which are in-use. Perhaps the initial > in-sync-ness check opens the file in exclusive mode and fails? I > know the in-use files were still in sync because they were when > setup started. Setup didn't complain about anything and I didn't > start any new processes after it completed. > > Another idea: right now rebase[all] seems to give up if it > encounters an in-use file. Can it just skip the file and keep going? http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2012-03/msg00028.html Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple