X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:33:40 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: clock_getres(CLOCK_REALTIME, .) may return an outdated and too high resolution Message-ID: <20120322093340.GW18032@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4F6A5D42 DOT 3030108 AT t-online DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F6A5D42.3030108@t-online.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Mar 21 23:59, Christian Franke wrote: > clock_getres(CLOCK_REALTIME, &ts) queries the actual resolution through > NtQueryTimerResolution (&coarsest, &finest, &actual) during its > first call and returns this value unchanged afterwards. > > This returns a global Windows setting which may be temporarily > modified by other applications by using e.g. timeBegin/EndPeriod(). > For example playing a flash video in browser sets the resolution to > 1ms. It is reset to default ~15ms when the browser is closed. > > As a consequence the actual resolution might be much lower than > reported by clock_getres() when clock_gettime() is used for > measurements later. It would IMO be better to return the 'coarsest' > instead of the 'actual' value. clock_getres already returns the coarsest time. Did you mean the setting in hires_ms::resolution, by any chance? It's using the actual setting right now. > If clock_setres() is used, this setting should be returned instead > of the 'actual' value at the time of the setting. Well, I'm not overly concerned about clock_setres, given that it's probably not used at all :) > BTW: GetSystemTimeAsFileTime() apparently provides the same > resolution (at least on Win7 x64). So the more complex use of > SharedUserData.InterruptTime may have less benefit than expected. On pre-Vista, the accuracy of GetSystemTimeAsFileTime is 15.625 ms, fixed. On Vista and later it seems to be 15ms or better, but its resultion is not constant anymore. But I'm not shure either, if the timeGetTime_ns shuffle has any positive effect. Given that we allow a jitter of 40 ms, we''re potentially worse off than by just calling GetSystemTimeAsFileTime and be done with it. Also, all processes would be guaranteed to be on the same time, not only the processes within the same session sharing gtod. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple