X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:04:35 +0100 From: Denis Excoffier To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: BLODA detection code in latest snapshot Message-ID: <20120321110459.GA2812@qp9482> References: <20120227122614 DOT GB31025 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4F4C41B5 DOT 7040804 AT acm DOT org> <20120228092144 DOT GB23052 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20120321093959 DOT GA4608 AT qp9482> <20120321104326 DOT GA15526 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120321104326.GA15526@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:43:26AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> I added advapi32.dll to the list of ignored DLLs. There's more stuff >> starting new threads under the hood than I expected. Thank you. Incidentally, why in the quoted message, and also in http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2012-03/msg00567.html some of the References indicated (eg <20120227122614 DOT GB31025 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>) are not "clickable"? Compare eg with http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2012-02/msg00826.html Could it be: - a 29th February problem? - a ' AT ' or ' DOT ' problem? Regards, Denis Excoffier. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple