X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,KHOP_DYNAMIC X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4F6996EB.7040702@list-post.mks-mail.de> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:52:59 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Markus_Sch=F6nhaber?= Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120209 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin archive References: <20120321072922 DOT GA4680 AT qp9482> In-Reply-To: <20120321072922.GA4680@qp9482> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com 21.03.2012 08:29, Denis Excoffier: > Please if someone can do something, i have to search for "detect_bloda". In my archive, I find "detect_bloda" (literally) - in a thread Corinna started on Feb/27/2012 "BLODA detection code in latest snapshot", - in a post of yours Mar/3/2012 "Re: cygwin-1.7.10-1 fork - address space needed by ... already in use" - in the post of yours I just replied to. -- Regards mks -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple