X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_20,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4F63E5A7.5050806@cs.utoronto.ca>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 21:15:19 -0400
From: Ryan Johnson <ryan DOT johnson AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Status of large address awareness?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Hi all,

What's the current status of large address awareness for cygwin 
binaries? I know at one point it seemed to be working well -- other than 
an issue with emacs (fixed now?) -- and there was talk of making it the 
default. However, this does not seem to be the case yet, based on 
looking at peflags for a couple of binaries.

Thoughts?
Ryan

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple