X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4F6058FA.1020103@shaddybaddah.name> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:38:18 +1100 From: Shaddy Baddah User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111114 Icedove/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Snapshot 2012-03-09 breaks emacs -nw References: <4F604E90 DOT 1070909 AT shaddybaddah DOT name> <4F6055C0 DOT 5040701 AT gmail DOT com> In-Reply-To: <4F6055C0.5040701@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Hi Marco, On 14/03/12 19:24, marco atzeri wrote: >> I've noticed that snapshot 2012-03-09 has broken calls to emacs -nw. >> Specifically, it breaks emacs-X11 -nw. Attempting to run from a standard >> mintty/bash terminal, the execution just "no-ops" back to the prompt. >> >> Running emacs-nox works fine. Also, attempting to run emacs-X11 -nw >> under strace actually makes the attempt succeed. >> > > 2012-03-12 is the latest, could you check it ? Yes, sorry, I rushed my email. I do mean snapshot 2012-03-09 through to 2012-03-12. Fingers crossed it is as easy to reproduce as I have managed. -- Regards, Shaddy -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple