X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 14:07:23 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: gcc-4.7.0-RC-20120302 fails to build for i686-pc-cygwin Message-ID: <20120307130723.GB14210@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4F575A90 DOT 8060201 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F575A90.8060201@cs.utoronto.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Mar 7 07:54, Ryan Johnson wrote: > Hi all, > > I tried to bootstrap the gcc-4.7 RC and it fails because it expects > to find and the file actually lives in > (see > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52513). > > I'm asking here because the gcc devs thought this would mean 4.6 is > broken as well, but I have 4.6.2 running. Did process.h perhaps move > between 1.7.10 and 1.7.11? I guess configure must be using linker > rather than preprocessor tests for presence of spawnve, because it > thinks (correctly) that the function exists. See http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2012-02/msg00041.html We moved it back. If you have it in cygwin/process.h, you didn't update from 1.7.10 to 1.7.11. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple