X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgEFAMAdUU+rRDoG/2dsb2JhbABDhT+uD3iBB4F9AQEBAwEBAg8BEA0ENxMLAgEIFQUCBgYXAQICAgEBJh4RAQEEEwgah18EAQugegGMZYo7BIEvjR8zYwSIUIpJlTs Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: RE: New package: openjpeg-1.5.0-1 Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 11:24:43 -0800 Message-ID: <70952A932255A2489522275A628B97C3129F514D@xmb-sjc-233.amer.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <4F505942.4040100@cisra.canon.com.au> References: <4F505942 DOT 4040100 AT cisra DOT canon DOT com DOT au> From: "Matt Seitz (matseitz)" To: "The Cygwin Mailing List" X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id q22JPNHu006608 > From: Luke Kendall [mailto:luke DOT kendall AT cisra DOT canon DOT com DOT au] > > I'm no expert, but I thought any JPEG 2000 implementation required use > of patented technologies. Do the implementers make some statement about > the patent situation for openjpeg? Does this help? https://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/2007-February/000340.html I found this by using: https://encrypted.google.com/search?q=openjpeg+patent