X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Yahoo-SMTP: QDdxPgyswBCK2bx7SNYDilAqkd6GnSZOMbWnqiDrvOLygeouYdY- Message-ID: <4F5072B5.7060707@bellsouth.net> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 01:11:49 -0600 From: Robert Miles User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com CC: Jeremy Bopp Subject: Re: Recent upgrade to wish leads to a problem References: <70952A932255A2489522275A628B97C3129F4CE4 AT xmb-sjc-233 DOT amer DOT cisco DOT com> <4F4FC897 DOT 1080604 AT redhat DOT com> <4F4FD01E DOT 1000808 AT bopp DOT net> In-Reply-To: <4F4FD01E.1000808@bopp.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 3/1/2012 1:38 PM, Jeremy Bopp wrote: > On 03/01/2012 01:05 PM, Eric Blake wrote: >> On 03/01/2012 10:53 AM, Matt Seitz (matseitz) wrote: >>> You don't think that Setup telling the user "package xyz requires >>> package xinit" might at least tip off some users that running xyz now >>> requires starting an X server? >>> >>> Even if it doesn't reduce the questions, would it at least reduce the >>> problem of users now having to run Setup a second time to download and >>> install the xinit package? >> While I can't control whether Yaakov adds xinit as a dependency to >> tcl-tk, I personally wouldn't mind adding xinit as a prereq to gitk and >> git-gui, since I maintain that package. There's still that annoyance >> factor that just depending on xinit won't get X running, but at least it >> will let you download all the bits in one run of setup.exe instead of >> hitting the FAQ and finding out you have to rerun setup.exe. > I don't think I've ever seen it, but does setup.exe support the notion > of recommended and/or suggested packages? > > It seems that the main issue is that xinit is not a hard dependency of > these tools/libraries and thus they should not have a hard dependency on > xinit defined in the package definition. However, it might make sense > to make xinit a recommended dependency that setup.exe could offer to > install by default or at least notify the user that they may want to > install. > I suspect not, but I would like to see such recommended and/or suggested packages. Back when I was using Cygwin gcc so I could learn C, m4 was not installed along with it, and I believe that m4 should at least be shown as a recommended package to go along with gcc. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple