X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <1330670210.6952.93.camel@YAAKOV04> Subject: Re: New package: openjpeg-1.5.0-1 From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 00:36:50 -0600 In-Reply-To: <4F505942.4040100@cisra.canon.com.au> References: <1330665164 DOT 6952 DOT 34 DOT camel AT YAAKOV04> <4F505942 DOT 4040100 AT cisra DOT canon DOT com DOT au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 16:23 +1100, Luke Kendall wrote: > I'm no expert, but I thought any JPEG 2000 implementation required use > of patented technologies. Do the implementers make some statement about > the patent situation for openjpeg? Please do not spread FUD. This package is available in Fedora, which takes patent issues seriously, and has therefore been deemed acceptable for the Cygwin distribution as well. Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple