X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eboyd53sf AT gmail DOT com designates 10.52.29.241 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.52.29.241;
Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eboyd53sf AT gmail DOT com designates 10.52.29.241 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eboyd53sf AT gmail DOT com; dkim=pass header.i=eboyd53sf AT gmail DOT com
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20120301182144.GC28713@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
References: <70952A932255A2489522275A628B97C3129F4CF6 AT xmb-sjc-233 DOT amer DOT cisco DOT com>	<20120301182144 DOT GC28713 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 13:28:31 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+sc5m=SBn-zbgeCub9_Xr1Hyfai_bPxj94K4NwJYXK04+FgSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Recent upgrade to wish leads to a problem
From: Earnie Boyd <earnie AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id q21ISv0V029978

On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 10:07:33AM -0800, Matt Seitz (matseitz) wrote:
>>"Matt Seitz (matseitz)"
>>>"Christopher Faylor" wrote:
>>>
>>>> In the meantime, if people are piling on to suggest this because they
>>>> think it will cause someone to add xinit as a dependency to something
>>>> please be assured that this will not happen.
>>>
>>> OK, what would cause someone to add xinit as a dependency to
>>something?
>>
>>One reason I keep asking this question is that I don't understand the
>>rationale against adding xinit.
>
> Yaakov posted the rationale.  You responded to it.  Additional messages
> insisting how much you want this are really pretty pointless.

<quote>
Here's my advice: it would be a better use of your time to install xinit
and accustom yourself to the wonders of X rather than hopelessly trying
to find a way to continue living in the past.
</quote>

<quote>
Using X requires user intervention to start an X server first.  No
amount of automatic dependencies will change this, and therefore I don't
expect that the number of questions would change one iota.
</quote>

But if TK needs an X server started in must be a installed and is a
dependency of TK to have X server.  Yes, one has to start it but why
not require the dependency so that the X server software exists to use
already?  I agree with Matt, I'm not getting the angst for adding the
X server as a dependency for TK which requires it.  Having to start it
is a different matter.

-- 
Earnie
-- https://sites.google.com/site/earnieboyd

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple