X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/mailhop/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX184OvuT2OHPSDhycepa5jpx Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 13:28:05 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Recent upgrade to wish leads to a problem Message-ID: <20120301182805.GD28713@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <70952A932255A2489522275A628B97C3129F4CE5 AT xmb-sjc-233 DOT amer DOT cisco DOT com> <20120301181416 DOT GB28713 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 01:20:49PM -0500, Earnie Boyd wrote: >On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 09:54:23AM -0800, Matt Seitz (matseitz) wrote: >>>"Christopher Faylor" wrote: >>>> >>>> In the meantime, if people are piling on to suggest this because they >>>> think it will cause someone to add xinit as a dependency to something >>>> please be assured that this will not happen. >>> >>>OK, what would cause someone to add xinit as a dependency to something? >> >> There is nothing in what I wrote which would suggest that adding xinit as >> a dependency was a possibility. > >I agree with Matt. If TK is requiring the use of the X server then >the X server should be a package dependency of TK. It wasn't a >dependency before because the X server wasn't needed but now the X >server is needed to use TK. TK does not require an X server running on the same system. This has been explained in this very thread. If you have points to make, don't make them with a "me too" unless you're planning on addressing the issues that Yaakov raised. Otherwise you're just wasting bandwidth. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple